AI & Agents

AgenQ

Last updated 2026-07-30 · benchmark measured 2026-08-13 — deterministic & reproducible

AgenQ Nina is an AI product assistant that guides users through SaaS workflows via voice and chat.

Is AgenQ production-ready?

Legit.Show scores AgenQ 67 out of 100 — the simple average of its 7 measured frames. Legit.Show ran its deterministic 7-Frame production-readiness benchmark on AgenQ (public-surface assessment), measured from the public surface with no LLM in the scoring path. Its strongest frame is Performance; its weakest is Privacy. Every frame it averages is published with its evidence on the Legit.Show listing.

The 7 Frames

• Performance — 96/100
• Accessibility — 92/100
• Security — 45/100
• Privacy — 0/100
• Reliability — 55/100
• Standards — 89/100
• Discoverability — 90/100

What we measured

• Security headers present: CSP.
• No HSTS.
• Served over HTTPS with a valid certificate.
• Real Lighthouse performance run — 406 ms to first byte.
• 1 of 3 sampled routes reachable.
• No privacy policy found.
• Sets cookies / loads scripts with no consent prompt.
• Discoverable: structured data, OpenGraph image, canonical URL.

Who built it

Nicholas Chan · product account @agenQ_AI

Who it's for

SaaS teams · Product managers · Customer success teams · Growing companies · Enterprise organizations

Pricing

Starter: $99/month (or $79/month billed annually) for 1 NINA; Growth: $499/month (or $399/month billed annually) for 2 NINAs; Enterprise: custom pricing for unlimited NINAs; additional usage $0.07/min

Visit AgenQ → · Alternatives to AgenQ → · How this was measured →