Is failproof ai secure?

Legit.Show measured failproof ai's Security frame at 25/100. No Content-Security-Policy and no HSTS. Served over HTTPS with a valid certificate.

How does Legit.Show measure failproof ai?

Legit.Show scores seven frames — Performance, Accessibility, Security, Privacy, Reliability, Standards and Discoverability — deterministically from the public surface (URL, HTTP headers, real Lighthouse), with no LLM in the scoring path. See legit.show/methodology.

AI & Agents

failproof ai

Last updated 2026-09-07 · benchmark measured 2026-09-07 — deterministic & reproducible

Failproof AI monitors AI agents for silent failures and policy violations.

78/100

7/7 frames

Top 51% of 14,148 measured · #21 of 33 in llm observability

Legit Benchmark — the simple average of 7 measured frames. Frames we could not measure are left out of the average, never counted as zero. Every frame is shown below with its evidence.

Checked 2026-09-07 · scores move as sites change

Are you the maker of failproof ai? Claim this listing. It is free, takes a meta tag, a DNS record or GitHub admin rights, and never changes the score.

Launched something? Add your product, free.

To cite this score: legit.show/s/befailproof-ai/2026-09-07. That address never changes; this page moves with every re-measure.

Legit.Show scored failproof ai 78/100 on 2026-09-07, measured across all 7 frames from its public surface. legit.show/s/befailproof-ai/2026-09-07

Is failproof ai production-ready?

Legit.Show scores failproof ai 78 out of 100 — the simple average of its 7 measured frames. Legit.Show ran its deterministic 7-Frame production-readiness benchmark on failproof ai (public-surface assessment), measured from the public surface with no LLM in the scoring path. Its strongest frame is Reliability; its weakest is Security. Every frame it averages is published with its evidence on the Legit.Show listing.

The 7 Frames

Performance — 60/100
Accessibility — 91/100
Security — 25/100
How this compares across the catalogue: The Web Security Baseline
Privacy — 75/100
How this compares across the catalogue: The Privacy Gap
Reliability — 100/100
Standards — 92/100
Discoverability — 100/100

What we measured

No Content-Security-Policy and no HSTS.
Served over HTTPS with a valid certificate.
Real Lighthouse performance run — 250 ms to first byte.
Returns a proper 404 for unknown routes.
3 of 3 sampled routes reachable.
Has a reachable privacy policy.
Sets cookies / loads scripts with no consent prompt.
Discoverable: structured data, sitemap, OpenGraph image, canonical URL.

Who built it

Nivedit Jain (@niveditjain) · product account @failproofai

Who it's for

AI engineers · Agent developers · Teams building with Claude/Cursor/Gemini · Enterprises running AI agents · ML operations teams

Pricing

Free Forever (5,000 runs/month, 100 evals/month); Team $99/month (50,000 runs/month); Scale $599/month (500,000 runs/month); Enterprise custom

Sources and updates

Description: Taken from befailproof.ai's own website on 2026-09-07.
Operator: ExosphereHost, Inc., as named in befailproof.ai's terms, privacy page or footer.
Benchmark: Measured by Legit.Show from the live site, the way any visitor sees it — with no access to its code or accounts. Same method for every product, and no AI decides the score. Last checked 2026-09-07.

Put together from public information, without failproof ai's involvement. If anything here is wrong, tell us and a person will check it.

Visit failproof ai → · Alternatives to failproof ai → · How this was measured →