Legit.Show measured Call2Me's Security frame at 45/100. Security headers present: X-Content-Type-Options, Referrer-Policy. No Content-Security-Policy and no HSTS. Served over HTTPS with a valid certificate.

How does Legit.Show measure Call2Me?

Legit.Show scores seven frames — Performance, Accessibility, Security, Privacy, Reliability, Standards and Discoverability — deterministically from the public surface (URL, HTTP headers, real Lighthouse), with no LLM in the scoring path. See legit.show/methodology.

AI & Agents

Call2Me

Last updated 2026-07-05 · benchmark measured 2026-09-24 — deterministic & reproducible

Call2Me is a pay-as-you-go AI voice agent platform for handling real phone calls.

77/100

7/7 frames

Top 54% of 14,208 measured · #12 of 17 in ai voice agent platform

Legit Benchmark — the simple average of 7 measured frames. Frames we could not measure are left out of the average, never counted as zero. Every frame is shown below with its evidence.

Checked 2026-09-24 · scores move as sites change

Are you the maker of Call2Me? Claim this listing. It is free, takes a meta tag, a DNS record or GitHub admin rights, and never changes the score.

Launched something? Add your product, free.

To cite this score: legit.show/s/call2me-app/2026-09-24. That address never changes; this page moves with every re-measure.

Legit.Show scored Call2Me 77/100 on 2026-09-24, measured across all 7 frames from its public surface. legit.show/s/call2me-app/2026-09-24

Is Call2Me production-ready?

Legit.Show scores Call2Me 77 out of 100 — the simple average of its 7 measured frames. Legit.Show ran its deterministic 7-Frame production-readiness benchmark on Call2Me (public-surface assessment), measured from the public surface with no LLM in the scoring path. Its strongest frame is Reliability; its weakest is Performance. Every frame it averages is published with its evidence on the Legit.Show listing.

The 7 Frames

Performance — 39/100
Accessibility — 91/100
Security — 45/100
How this compares across the catalogue: The Web Security Baseline
Privacy — 75/100
How this compares across the catalogue: The Privacy Gap
Reliability — 100/100
Standards — 89/100
Discoverability — 100/100

What we measured

Security headers present: X-Content-Type-Options, Referrer-Policy.
No Content-Security-Policy and no HSTS.
Served over HTTPS with a valid certificate.
Real Lighthouse performance run — 147 ms to first byte.
Returns a proper 404 for unknown routes.
3 of 3 sampled routes reachable.
Has a reachable privacy policy.
Sets cookies / loads scripts with no consent prompt.

Who built it

Umut Çetinkaya

Who it's for

Small businesses · Call centers · Agencies · Developers · Enterprises

Pricing

$0.10/min for voice agent (STT+LLM+TTS); +$0.05/min for telephony; +$0.05/min for recording; $0.01/msg for chat widget. $5 free credits for new accounts. No monthly fees, no minimum commitment.

Sources and updates

Description: Taken from call2me.app's own website on 2026-07-05.
Operator: Call2Me, as named in call2me.app's terms, privacy page or footer.
Benchmark: Measured by Legit.Show from the live site, the way any visitor sees it — with no access to its code or accounts. Same method for every product, and no AI decides the score. Last checked 2026-09-24.

Put together from public information, without Call2Me's involvement. If anything here is wrong, tell us and a person will check it.

Visit Call2Me → · Alternatives to Call2Me → · How this was measured →