Legit.Show measured Cognee's Security frame at 80/100. Security headers present: HSTS, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, Referrer-Policy. Served over HTTPS with a valid certificate.

How does Legit.Show measure Cognee?

Legit.Show scores seven frames — Performance, Accessibility, Security, Privacy, Reliability, Standards and Discoverability — deterministically from the public surface (URL, HTTP headers, real Lighthouse), with no LLM in the scoring path. See legit.show/methodology.

AI & Agents

Cognee

Last updated 2026-09-27 · benchmark measured 2026-09-27 — deterministic & reproducible

Cognee is a token-based AI memory engine for building agents with structured memory.

75/100

7/7 frames

Top 60% of 14,138 measured · #30 of 57 in ai agent memory

Legit Benchmark — the simple average of 7 measured frames. Frames we could not measure are left out of the average, never counted as zero. Every frame is shown below with its evidence.

Checked 2026-09-27 · scores move as sites change

Are you the maker of Cognee? Claim this listing. It is free, takes a meta tag, a DNS record or GitHub admin rights, and never changes the score.

Launched something? Add your product, free.

To cite this score: legit.show/s/cognee-ai/2026-09-27. That address never changes; this page moves with every re-measure.

Legit.Show scored Cognee 75/100 on 2026-09-27, measured across all 7 frames from its public surface. legit.show/s/cognee-ai/2026-09-27

Is Cognee production-ready?

Legit.Show scores Cognee 75 out of 100 — the simple average of its 7 measured frames. Legit.Show ran its deterministic 7-Frame production-readiness benchmark on Cognee (public-surface assessment), measured from the public surface with no LLM in the scoring path. Its strongest frame is Reliability; its weakest is Privacy. Every frame it averages is published with its evidence on the Legit.Show listing.

The 7 Frames

Performance — 32/100
Accessibility — 95/100
Security — 80/100
How this compares across the catalogue: The Web Security Baseline
Privacy — 25/100
How this compares across the catalogue: The Privacy Gap
Reliability — 100/100
Standards — 92/100
Discoverability — 100/100

What we measured

Security headers present: HSTS, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, Referrer-Policy.
No Content-Security-Policy.
Served over HTTPS with a valid certificate.
Real Lighthouse performance run — 149 ms to first byte.
Returns a proper 404 for unknown routes.
3 of 3 sampled routes reachable.
No privacy policy found.
Sets cookies / loads scripts with no consent prompt.

Who built it

Vasilije Markovic (@tricalt) · product account @cognee_

Who it's for

AI agent builders · Multi-agent system developers · LLM application teams · Enterprises scaling agents

Pricing

Free tier ($0/month, 1M tokens + 1 workspace); Standard ($1.00 per 1M tokens + $5 per workspace); Enterprise (custom BYOC engagement); Startup packages available

Sources and updates

Description: Taken from cognee.ai's own website on 2026-09-27.
Operator: Topoteretes UG. (haftungsbeschränkt), as named in cognee.ai's terms, privacy page or footer.
Benchmark: Measured by Legit.Show from the live site, the way any visitor sees it — with no access to its code or accounts. Same method for every product, and no AI decides the score. Last checked 2026-09-27.

Put together from public information, without Cognee's involvement. If anything here is wrong, tell us and a person will check it.

Visit Cognee → · Alternatives to Cognee → · How this was measured →