Legit.Show measured Crack On's Security frame at 80/100. Security headers present: HSTS, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, Referrer-Policy. Served over HTTPS with a valid certificate.

How does Legit.Show measure Crack On?

Legit.Show scores seven frames — Performance, Accessibility, Security, Privacy, Reliability, Standards and Discoverability — deterministically from the public surface (URL, HTTP headers, real Lighthouse), with no LLM in the scoring path. See legit.show/methodology.

Business & Finance

Crack On

Last updated 2026-07-17 · benchmark measured 2026-09-08 — deterministic & reproducible

Crack On is a ranked directory of real Australian consumer problems for founders to build on.

79/100

7/7 frames

Top 47% of 14,148 measured · #23 of 39 in startup idea validation

Legit Benchmark — the simple average of 7 measured frames. Frames we could not measure are left out of the average, never counted as zero. Every frame is shown below with its evidence.

Checked 2026-09-08 · scores move as sites change

Are you the maker of Crack On? Claim this listing. It is free, takes a meta tag, a DNS record or GitHub admin rights, and never changes the score.

Launched something? Add your product, free.

To cite this score: legit.show/s/crackon-app/2026-09-08. That address never changes; this page moves with every re-measure.

Legit.Show scored Crack On 79/100 on 2026-09-08, measured across all 7 frames from its public surface. legit.show/s/crackon-app/2026-09-08

Is Crack On production-ready?

Legit.Show scores Crack On 79 out of 100 — the simple average of its 7 measured frames. Legit.Show ran its deterministic 7-Frame production-readiness benchmark on Crack On (public-surface assessment), measured from the public surface with no LLM in the scoring path. Its strongest frame is Reliability; its weakest is Discoverability. Every frame it averages is published with its evidence on the Legit.Show listing.

The 7 Frames

Performance — 76/100
Accessibility — 94/100
Security — 80/100
How this compares across the catalogue: The Web Security Baseline
Privacy — 70/100
How this compares across the catalogue: The Privacy Gap
Reliability — 100/100
Standards — 89/100
Discoverability — 45/100

What we measured

Security headers present: HSTS, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, Referrer-Policy.
No Content-Security-Policy.
Served over HTTPS with a valid certificate.
Real Lighthouse performance run — 1689 ms to first byte.
Returns a proper 404 for unknown routes.
3 of 3 sampled routes reachable.
Has a reachable privacy policy.
Sets cookies / loads scripts with no consent prompt.

Who it's for

Australian founders · entrepreneurs · startup builders · solution developers

Pricing

Free first deep-dive; single report A$12; 5-pack A$39 (A$7.80 each); 15-pack A$99 (A$6.60 each); Pro A$49/month for 20 deep-dives

Sources and updates

Description: Taken from crackon.app's own website on 2026-07-17.
Benchmark: Measured by Legit.Show from the live site, the way any visitor sees it — with no access to its code or accounts. Same method for every product, and no AI decides the score. Last checked 2026-09-08.

Put together from public information, without Crack On's involvement. If anything here is wrong, tell us and a person will check it.

Visit Crack On → · Alternatives to Crack On → · How this was measured →