Legit.Show measured Curio's Security frame at 80/100. Security headers present: HSTS, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, Referrer-Policy. Served over HTTPS with a valid certificate.

How does Legit.Show measure Curio?

Legit.Show scores seven frames — Performance, Accessibility, Security, Privacy, Reliability, Standards and Discoverability — deterministically from the public surface (URL, HTTP headers, real Lighthouse), with no LLM in the scoring path. See legit.show/methodology.

AI & Agents

Curio

Last updated 2026-07-07 · benchmark measured 2026-09-15 — deterministic & reproducible

Embeddable chat assistant that answers questions from your own content with citations.

85/100

7/7 frames

Top 28% of 14,510 measured · #9 of 25 in website chatbot builder

Legit Benchmark — the simple average of 7 measured frames. Frames we could not measure are left out of the average, never counted as zero. Every frame is shown below with its evidence.

Checked 2026-09-15 · scores move as sites change

Are you the maker of Curio? Claim this listing. It is free, takes a meta tag, a DNS record or GitHub admin rights, and never changes the score.

Launched something? Add your product, free.

To cite this score: legit.show/s/getcurio-chat/2026-09-15. That address never changes; this page moves with every re-measure.

Legit.Show scored Curio 85/100 on 2026-09-15, measured across all 7 frames from its public surface. legit.show/s/getcurio-chat/2026-09-15

Is Curio production-ready?

Legit.Show scores Curio 85 out of 100 — the simple average of its 7 measured frames. Legit.Show ran its deterministic 7-Frame production-readiness benchmark on Curio (public-surface assessment), measured from the public surface with no LLM in the scoring path. Its strongest frame is Privacy; its weakest is Discoverability. Every frame it averages is published with its evidence on the Legit.Show listing.

The 7 Frames

Performance — 99/100
Accessibility — 94/100
Security — 80/100
How this compares across the catalogue: The Web Security Baseline
Privacy — 100/100
How this compares across the catalogue: The Privacy Gap
Reliability — 100/100
Standards — 77/100
Discoverability — 45/100

What we measured

Security headers present: HSTS, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, Referrer-Policy.
No Content-Security-Policy.
Served over HTTPS with a valid certificate.
Real Lighthouse performance run — 458 ms to first byte.
Returns a proper 404 for unknown routes.
3 of 3 sampled routes reachable.
Has a reachable privacy policy.
Sets cookies / loads scripts with no consent prompt.

Who it's for

Agencies · Website owners · Support teams · Product documentation teams · Customer support departments

Pricing

30-day free trial (5 free conversations/day); then prepaid pay-as-you-go credits per message

Sources and updates

Description: Taken from getcurio.chat's own website on 2026-07-07.
Operator: phpMyDEV, LLC, as named in getcurio.chat's terms, privacy page or footer.
Benchmark: Measured by Legit.Show from the live site, the way any visitor sees it — with no access to its code or accounts. Same method for every product, and no AI decides the score. Last checked 2026-09-15.

Put together from public information, without Curio's involvement. If anything here is wrong, tell us and a person will check it.

Visit Curio → · Alternatives to Curio → · How this was measured →