MCP & Integrations
cc-connect
Last updated 2026-06-14 · benchmark checked 2026-08-09 · unchanged since 2026-07-31 — deterministic & reproducible
Bridge local AI coding agents (Claude Code, Cursor, Gemini CLI, Codex) to messaging platforms (Feishu/Lark, DingTalk, Slack, Telegram, Discord, LINE, WeChat Work). Chat with your AI dev assistant from anywhere — no public IP required for most platforms.
Is cc-connect production-ready?
Legit.Show scores cc-connect 38 out of 100 — the simple average of its 3 measured frames. Legit.Show ran its deterministic 7-Frame production-readiness benchmark on cc-connect (github assessment), measured from the public surface with no LLM in the scoring path. Its strongest frame is Security; its weakest is Discoverability. 3 of the seven frames returned a score; Performance, Accessibility, Privacy and Reliability were not measurable on this service and are recorded as null — not as zero. Maintenance is an additional frame from the open-source teardown, scored separately from the seven. Every frame it averages is published with its evidence on the Legit.Show listing.
The 7 Frames
- Performance — not measurable on this service (null — not scored as 0)
- Accessibility — not measurable on this service (null — not scored as 0)
- Security — 40/100
- Privacy — not measurable on this service (null — not scored as 0)
- Reliability — not measurable on this service (null — not scored as 0)
- Standards — 40/100
- Discoverability — 35/100
Open-source teardown
Scored separately — not one of the seven.
- Maintenance — 100/100
What we measured
- No Content-Security-Policy and no HSTS.
- No privacy policy found.
- Sets cookies / loads scripts with no consent prompt.
Who built it
aurelio avila
Visit cc-connect → · Alternatives to cc-connect → · How this was measured →