AI & Agents

bug-hunter

Last updated 2026-06-22 · benchmark measured 2026-08-09 — deterministic & reproducible

Adversarial AI bug hunter with auto-fix skill for Claude Code, Cursor, Codex CLI, GitHub Copilot CLI, Kiro CLI, Opencode, Pi Coding Agent, and more. Multi-agent pipeline finds security vulnerabilities, logic errors, and runtime bugs — then fixes them autonomously on a safe branch

Is bug-hunter production-ready?

Legit.Show scores bug-hunter 85 out of 100 — the simple average of its 3 measured frames. Legit.Show ran its deterministic 7-Frame production-readiness benchmark on bug-hunter (github assessment), measured from the public surface with no LLM in the scoring path. Its strongest frame is Standards; its weakest is Discoverability. 3 of the seven frames returned a score; Performance, Accessibility, Privacy and Reliability were not measurable on this service and are recorded as null — not as zero. Maintenance is an additional frame from the open-source teardown, scored separately from the seven. Every frame it averages is published with its evidence on the Legit.Show listing.

The 7 Frames

• Performance — not measurable on this service (null — not scored as 0)
• Accessibility — not measurable on this service (null — not scored as 0)
• Security — 90/100
• Privacy — not measurable on this service (null — not scored as 0)
• Reliability — not measurable on this service (null — not scored as 0)
• Standards — 100/100
• Discoverability — 65/100

Open-source teardown

Scored separately — not one of the seven.

• Maintenance — 100/100

What we measured

• No Content-Security-Policy and no HSTS.
• No privacy policy found.
• Sets cookies / loads scripts with no consent prompt.

Who built it

Abhishek Tiwari

Visit bug-hunter → · Alternatives to bug-hunter → · How this was measured →