Developer Tools

Jev helps you to not run malicous code

Source: luantak/is-malicious

Last updated 2026-09-18 · benchmark measured 2026-09-18 — deterministic & reproducible

Jev scans code to detect and flag potentially malicious packages.

Are you the maker of Jev helps you to not run malicous code? Claim this listing. It is free, takes a meta tag, a DNS record or GitHub admin rights, and never changes the score.

Launched something? Add your product, free.

To cite this score: legit.show/s/gh-jev-helps-you-to-not-run-malicous-code/2026-09-18. That address never changes; this page moves with every re-measure.

Legit.Show scored Jev helps you to not run malicous code 89/100 on 2026-09-18, measured across 4 of 7 frames from its public surface. legit.show/s/gh-jev-helps-you-to-not-run-malicous-code/2026-09-18

Is Jev helps you to not run malicous code production-ready?

Legit.Show scores Jev helps you to not run malicous code 85 out of 100 — the simple average of its 3 measured frames. Legit.Show ran its deterministic 7-Frame production-readiness benchmark on Jev helps you to not run malicous code (github assessment), measured from the public surface with no LLM in the scoring path. Its strongest frame is Standards; its weakest is Discoverability. 3 of the seven frames returned a score; Performance, Accessibility, Privacy and Reliability were not measurable on this service and are recorded as null — not as zero. Maintenance is an additional frame from the open-source teardown, scored separately from the seven. Every frame it averages is published with its evidence on the Legit.Show listing.

The 7 Frames

• Performance — not measurable on this service (null — not scored as 0)
• Accessibility — not measurable on this service (null — not scored as 0)
• Security — 90/100
  How this compares across the catalogue: The Web Security Baseline
• Privacy — not measurable on this service (null — not scored as 0)
• Reliability — not measurable on this service (null — not scored as 0)
• Standards — 100/100
• Discoverability — 65/100

Open-source teardown

Scored separately — not one of the seven.

• Maintenance — 100/100

What we measured

• No Content-Security-Policy and no HSTS.
• No privacy policy found.
• Sets cookies / loads scripts with no consent prompt.

Who built it

Paul (@luantak_)

Who it's for

Developers · Open source maintainers · Security-conscious teams

Sources and updates

Description

Taken from github.com's own website on 2026-09-18.

Code

github.com/luantak/is-malicious.

Benchmark

Measured by Legit.Show from the live site, the way any visitor sees it — with no access to its code or accounts. Same method for every product, and no AI decides the score. Last checked 2026-09-18.

Put together from public information, without Jev helps you to not run malicous code's involvement. If anything here is wrong, tell us and a person will check it.

Visit Jev helps you to not run malicous code → · Alternatives to Jev helps you to not run malicous code → · How this was measured →