Legit.Show measured Kilo's Security frame at 70/100. Security headers present: HSTS, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options. Served over HTTPS with a valid certificate.

How does Legit.Show measure Kilo?

Legit.Show scores seven frames — Performance, Accessibility, Security, Privacy, Reliability, Standards and Discoverability — deterministically from the public surface (URL, HTTP headers, real Lighthouse), with no LLM in the scoring path. See legit.show/methodology.

AI & Agents

Kilo

Source: Kilo-Org/kilocode · ★ 20006 · TypeScript

Last updated 2026-06-11 · benchmark measured 2026-09-25 — deterministic & reproducible

Open source AI coding agent for VS Code, JetBrains, CLI, and cloud.

87/100

7/7 frames

Top 21% of 14,148 measured · #8 of 57 in ai coding agent

Legit Benchmark — the simple average of 7 measured frames. Frames we could not measure are left out of the average, never counted as zero. Every frame is shown below with its evidence.

Checked 2026-09-25 · scores move as sites change

Are you the maker of Kilo? Claim this listing. It is free, takes a meta tag, a DNS record or GitHub admin rights, and never changes the score.

Launched something? Add your product, free.

To cite this score: legit.show/s/gh-kilo-org-kilocode/2026-09-25. That address never changes; this page moves with every re-measure.

Legit.Show scored Kilo 87/100 on 2026-09-25, measured across all 7 frames from its public surface. legit.show/s/gh-kilo-org-kilocode/2026-09-25

Is Kilo production-ready?

Legit.Show scores Kilo 87 out of 100 — the simple average of its 7 measured frames. Legit.Show ran its deterministic 7-Frame production-readiness benchmark on Kilo (public-surface assessment), measured from the public surface with no LLM in the scoring path. Its strongest frame is Privacy; its weakest is Performance. Every frame it averages is published with its evidence on the Legit.Show listing.

The 7 Frames

Performance — 49/100
Accessibility — 87/100
Security — 70/100
How this compares across the catalogue: The Web Security Baseline
Privacy — 100/100
How this compares across the catalogue: The Privacy Gap
Reliability — 100/100
Standards — 100/100
Discoverability — 100/100

What we measured

Security headers present: HSTS, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options.
No Content-Security-Policy.
Served over HTTPS with a valid certificate.
Real Lighthouse performance run — 487 ms to first byte.
Returns a proper 404 for unknown routes.
3 of 3 sampled routes reachable.
Has a reachable privacy policy.
Sets cookies / loads scripts with no consent prompt.

Who built it

Scott Breitenother · product account @kilocode

Who it's for

Software developers · Development teams · Open source contributors · Enterprise developers · DevOps engineers

Pricing

Free tier available; Premium tiers with Auto Model pricing

Sources and updates

Description: Taken from kilo.ai's own website on 2026-06-11.
Operator: Kilo Code Inc., as named in kilo.ai's terms, privacy page or footer.
Code: github.com/Kilo-Org/kilocode.
Benchmark: Measured by Legit.Show from the live site, the way any visitor sees it — with no access to its code or accounts. Same method for every product, and no AI decides the score. Last checked 2026-09-25.

Put together from public information, without Kilo's involvement. If anything here is wrong, tell us and a person will check it.

Visit Kilo → · Alternatives to Kilo → · How this was measured →