Is OpenConnector secure?

Legit.Show measured OpenConnector's Security frame at 45/100. Security headers present: HSTS. Served over HTTPS with a valid certificate.

How does Legit.Show measure OpenConnector?

Legit.Show scores seven frames — Performance, Accessibility, Security, Privacy, Reliability, Standards and Discoverability — deterministically from the public surface (URL, HTTP headers, real Lighthouse), with no LLM in the scoring path. See legit.show/methodology.

Developer Tools

OpenConnector

Source: oomol-lab/open-connector · ★ 176 · TypeScript

Last updated 2026-07-05 · benchmark measured 2026-09-25 — deterministic & reproducible

OOMOL is a platform for connecting apps, running AI skills, and automating workflows.

89/100

7/7 frames

Top 16% of 14,148 measured · #7 of 42 in workflow automation platform

Legit Benchmark — the simple average of 7 measured frames. Frames we could not measure are left out of the average, never counted as zero. Every frame is shown below with its evidence.

Checked 2026-09-25 · scores move as sites change

Are you the maker of OpenConnector? Claim this listing. It is free, takes a meta tag, a DNS record or GitHub admin rights, and never changes the score.

Launched something? Add your product, free.

To cite this score: legit.show/s/gh-oomol-lab-open-connector/2026-09-25. That address never changes; this page moves with every re-measure.

Legit.Show scored OpenConnector 89/100 on 2026-09-25, measured across all 7 frames from its public surface. legit.show/s/gh-oomol-lab-open-connector/2026-09-25

Is OpenConnector production-ready?

Legit.Show scores OpenConnector 89 out of 100 — the simple average of its 7 measured frames. Legit.Show ran its deterministic 7-Frame production-readiness benchmark on OpenConnector (public-surface assessment), measured from the public surface with no LLM in the scoring path. Its strongest frame is Privacy; its weakest is Security. Every frame it averages is published with its evidence on the Legit.Show listing.

The 7 Frames

Performance — 90/100
Accessibility — 97/100
Security — 45/100
How this compares across the catalogue: The Web Security Baseline
Privacy — 100/100
How this compares across the catalogue: The Privacy Gap
Reliability — 100/100
Standards — 92/100
Discoverability — 100/100

What we measured

Security headers present: HSTS.
No Content-Security-Policy.
Served over HTTPS with a valid certificate.
Real Lighthouse performance run — 393 ms to first byte.
Returns a proper 404 for unknown routes.
3 of 3 sampled routes reachable.
Has a reachable privacy policy.
Sets cookies / loads scripts with no consent prompt.

Who built it

Shaun · product account @OomolStudio

Who it's for

AI agent developers · Backend engineers · Product teams · Startups · Enterprise developers

Pricing

Free plan with 20K app calls/month; Pro $20/month with 22 credits; Max $100/month with 120 credits; usage-based pricing for media, speech, and overage calls

Sources and updates

Description: Taken from oomol.com's own website on 2026-07-05.
Operator: OOMOL, as named in oomol.com's terms, privacy page or footer.
Code: github.com/oomol-lab/open-connector.
Benchmark: Measured by Legit.Show from the live site, the way any visitor sees it — with no access to its code or accounts. Same method for every product, and no AI decides the score. Last checked 2026-09-25.

Put together from public information, without OpenConnector's involvement. If anything here is wrong, tell us and a person will check it.

Visit OpenConnector → · Alternatives to OpenConnector → · How this was measured →