Is nextjs-subscription-payments secure?

Legit.Show measured nextjs-subscription-payments's Security frame at 50/100. Security headers present: HSTS. Served over HTTPS with a valid certificate.

How does Legit.Show measure nextjs-subscription-payments?

Legit.Show scores seven frames — Performance, Accessibility, Security, Privacy, Reliability, Standards and Discoverability — deterministically from the public surface (URL, HTTP headers, real Lighthouse), with no LLM in the scoring path. See legit.show/methodology.

Frameworks & Starter Kits

nextjs-subscription-payments

Source: vercel/nextjs-subscription-payments · ★ 7712 · TypeScript

Last updated 2026-06-06 · benchmark measured 2026-09-13 — deterministic & reproducible

A Next.js starter template for SaaS apps with subscription billing tiers.

74/100

7/7 frames

Top 63% of 14,148 measured · #17 of 30 in saas boilerplate

Legit Benchmark — the simple average of 7 measured frames. Frames we could not measure are left out of the average, never counted as zero. Every frame is shown below with its evidence.

Checked 2026-09-13 · scores move as sites change

Are you the maker of nextjs-subscription-payments? Claim this listing. It is free, takes a meta tag, a DNS record or GitHub admin rights, and never changes the score.

Launched something? Add your product, free.

To cite this score: legit.show/s/gh-vercel-nextjs-subscription-payments/2026-09-13. That address never changes; this page moves with every re-measure.

Legit.Show scored nextjs-subscription-payments 74/100 on 2026-09-13, measured across all 7 frames from its public surface. legit.show/s/gh-vercel-nextjs-subscription-payments/2026-09-13

Is nextjs-subscription-payments production-ready?

Legit.Show scores nextjs-subscription-payments 74 out of 100 — the simple average of its 7 measured frames. Legit.Show ran its deterministic 7-Frame production-readiness benchmark on nextjs-subscription-payments (public-surface assessment), measured from the public surface with no LLM in the scoring path. Its strongest frame is Accessibility; its weakest is Privacy. Every frame it averages is published with its evidence on the Legit.Show listing.

The 7 Frames

Performance — 96/100
Accessibility — 100/100
Security — 50/100
How this compares across the catalogue: The Web Security Baseline
Privacy — 25/100
How this compares across the catalogue: The Privacy Gap
Reliability — 100/100
Standards — 85/100
Discoverability — 60/100

What we measured

Security headers present: HSTS.
No Content-Security-Policy.
Served over HTTPS with a valid certificate.
Real Lighthouse performance run — 1270 ms to first byte.
Returns a proper 404 for unknown routes.
1 of 1 sampled routes reachable.
No privacy policy found.
Sets cookies / loads scripts with no consent prompt.

Who it's for

developers · startups · freelancers · businesses · SaaS builders

Pricing

$12/month (Hobby), $24/month (Freelancer), $32/month (Startup), $48/month (Enterprise)

Sources and updates

Description: Taken from subscription-payments.vercel.app's own website on 2026-06-06.
Operator: ACME, Inc., as named in subscription-payments.vercel.app's terms, privacy page or footer.
Code: github.com/vercel/nextjs-subscription-payments.
Benchmark: Measured by Legit.Show from the live site, the way any visitor sees it — with no access to its code or accounts. Same method for every product, and no AI decides the score. Last checked 2026-09-13.

Put together from public information, without nextjs-subscription-payments's involvement. If anything here is wrong, tell us and a person will check it.

Visit nextjs-subscription-payments → · Alternatives to nextjs-subscription-payments → · How this was measured →