Is Desktop Commander secure?

Legit.Show measured Desktop Commander's Security frame at 25/100. No Content-Security-Policy and no HSTS. Served over HTTPS with a valid certificate.

How does Legit.Show measure Desktop Commander?

Legit.Show scores seven frames — Performance, Accessibility, Security, Privacy, Reliability, Standards and Discoverability — deterministically from the public surface (URL, HTTP headers, real Lighthouse), with no LLM in the scoring path. See legit.show/methodology.

AI & Agents

Desktop Commander

Source: wonderwhy-er/DesktopCommanderMCP · ★ 6117 · TypeScript

Last updated 2026-06-06 · benchmark measured 2026-09-09 — deterministic & reproducible

Desktop Commander is a local AI agent that executes file, app, and workflow tasks on your computer.

65/100

5/7 frames

Top 84% of 14,148 measured · #18 of 21 in computer use agent

Legit Benchmark — the simple average of 5 measured frames. Frames we could not measure are left out of the average, never counted as zero. Every frame is shown below with its evidence.

Checked 2026-09-09 · scores move as sites change

Are you the maker of Desktop Commander? Claim this listing. It is free, takes a meta tag, a DNS record or GitHub admin rights, and never changes the score.

Launched something? Add your product, free.

To cite this score: legit.show/s/gh-wonderwhy-er-desktopcommandermcp/2026-09-09. That address never changes; this page moves with every re-measure.

Legit.Show scored Desktop Commander 65/100 on 2026-09-09, measured across 5 of 7 frames from its public surface. legit.show/s/gh-wonderwhy-er-desktopcommandermcp/2026-09-09

Is Desktop Commander production-ready?

Legit.Show scores Desktop Commander 65 out of 100 — the simple average of its 5 measured frames. Legit.Show ran its deterministic 7-Frame production-readiness benchmark on Desktop Commander (public-surface assessment), measured from the public surface with no LLM in the scoring path. Its strongest frame is Reliability; its weakest is Privacy. 5 of the seven frames returned a score; Performance and Accessibility were not measurable on this service and are recorded as null — not as zero. Every frame it averages is published with its evidence on the Legit.Show listing.

The 7 Frames

Performance — not measurable on this service (null — not scored as 0)
Accessibility — not measurable on this service (null — not scored as 0)
Security — 25/100
How this compares across the catalogue: The Web Security Baseline
Privacy — 25/100
How this compares across the catalogue: The Privacy Gap
Reliability — 100/100
Standards — 75/100
Discoverability — 100/100

What we measured

No Content-Security-Policy and no HSTS.
Served over HTTPS with a valid certificate.
Real Lighthouse performance run — 80 ms to first byte.
Returns a proper 404 for unknown routes.
3 of 3 sampled routes reachable.
No privacy policy found.
Sets cookies / loads scripts with no consent prompt.
Discoverable: structured data, sitemap, OpenGraph image, canonical URL.

Who built it

Eduard Ruzga (@wonderwhy_er) · product account @desktopcommandr

Who it's for

Builders · Knowledge workers · Data analysts · Developers · Non-technical users

Pricing

Free: $0/month with 200 messages/week; Pro: $7/month with unlimited messages

Sources and updates

Description: Taken from desktopcommander.app's own website on 2026-06-06.
Operator: Desktop Commander, as named in desktopcommander.app's terms, privacy page or footer.
Code: github.com/wonderwhy-er/DesktopCommanderMCP.
Benchmark: Measured by Legit.Show from the live site, the way any visitor sees it — with no access to its code or accounts. Same method for every product, and no AI decides the score. Last checked 2026-09-09.

Put together from public information, without Desktop Commander's involvement. If anything here is wrong, tell us and a person will check it.

Visit Desktop Commander → · Alternatives to Desktop Commander → · How this was measured →