Productivity
kalkal
Last updated 2026-07-08 · benchmark measured 2026-08-09 — deterministic & reproducible
Multi-calendar date converter supporting 20 historical and modern calendar systems.
63/100
Legit Benchmark — the simple average of 7 measured frames. Frames we could not measure are left out of the average, never counted as zero. Every frame is shown below with its evidence.
Is kalkal production-ready?
Legit.Show scores kalkal 63 out of 100 — the simple average of its 7 measured frames. Legit.Show ran its deterministic 7-Frame production-readiness benchmark on kalkal (public-surface assessment), measured from the public surface with no LLM in the scoring path. Its strongest frame is Standards; its weakest is Discoverability. Every frame it averages is published with its evidence on the Legit.Show listing.
The 7 Frames
- Performance — 99/100
- Accessibility — 87/100
- Security — 25/100
- Privacy — 25/100
- Reliability — 92/100
- Standards — 100/100
- Discoverability — 15/100
What we measured
- No Content-Security-Policy and no HSTS.
- Served over HTTPS with a valid certificate.
- Real Lighthouse performance run — 606 ms to first byte.
- Returns a proper 404 for unknown routes.
- 0 of 0 sampled routes reachable.
- No privacy policy found.
- Sets cookies / loads scripts with no consent prompt.
Who it's for
Researchers · Historians · International users · Religious scholars · Developers
Visit kalkal → · Alternatives to kalkal → · How this was measured →