Legit.Show measured Kiro's Security frame at 85/100. Security headers present: CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, Referrer-Policy. Served over HTTPS with a valid certificate.

How does Legit.Show measure Kiro?

Legit.Show scores seven frames — Performance, Accessibility, Security, Privacy, Reliability, Standards and Discoverability — deterministically from the public surface (URL, HTTP headers, real Lighthouse), with no LLM in the scoring path. See legit.show/methodology.

AI & Agents

Kiro

Last updated 2026-08-06 · benchmark measured 2026-09-22 — deterministic & reproducible

Kiro is an AI coding tool with tiered plans for individual developers and teams.

78/100

7/7 frames

Top 51% of 14,148 measured · #8 of 15 in ai code editor

Legit Benchmark — the simple average of 7 measured frames. Frames we could not measure are left out of the average, never counted as zero. Every frame is shown below with its evidence.

Checked 2026-09-22 · scores move as sites change

Are you the maker of Kiro? Claim this listing. It is free, takes a meta tag, a DNS record or GitHub admin rights, and never changes the score.

Launched something? Add your product, free.

To cite this score: legit.show/s/kiro-dev/2026-09-22. That address never changes; this page moves with every re-measure.

Legit.Show scored Kiro 78/100 on 2026-09-22, measured across all 7 frames from its public surface. legit.show/s/kiro-dev/2026-09-22

Is Kiro production-ready?

Legit.Show scores Kiro 78 out of 100 — the simple average of its 7 measured frames. Legit.Show ran its deterministic 7-Frame production-readiness benchmark on Kiro (public-surface assessment), measured from the public surface with no LLM in the scoring path. Its strongest frame is Reliability; its weakest is Privacy. Every frame it averages is published with its evidence on the Legit.Show listing.

The 7 Frames

Performance — 48/100
Accessibility — 97/100
Security — 85/100
How this compares across the catalogue: The Web Security Baseline
Privacy — 25/100
How this compares across the catalogue: The Privacy Gap
Reliability — 100/100
Standards — 89/100
Discoverability — 100/100

What we measured

Security headers present: CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, Referrer-Policy.
Served over HTTPS with a valid certificate.
Real Lighthouse performance run — 105 ms to first byte.
Returns a proper 404 for unknown routes.
3 of 3 sampled routes reachable.
No privacy policy found.
Sets cookies / loads scripts with no consent prompt.
Discoverable: structured data, sitemap, OpenGraph image, canonical URL.

Who built it

Kyle Seaman (@kyleseaman) · product account @kirodotdev

Who it's for

Developers · Development teams · Startups · Enterprises

Pricing

Free ($0, 50 credits); Pro ($20/month, 1,000 credits); Pro+ ($40/month, 2,000 credits); Pro Max ($100/month, 5,000 credits); Power ($200/month, 10,000 credits); add-on credits $0.04/credit

Sources and updates

Description: Taken from kiro.dev's own website on 2026-08-06.
Benchmark: Measured by Legit.Show from the live site, the way any visitor sees it — with no access to its code or accounts. Same method for every product, and no AI decides the score. Last checked 2026-09-22.

Put together from public information, without Kiro's involvement. If anything here is wrong, tell us and a person will check it.

Visit Kiro → · Alternatives to Kiro → · How this was measured →