Legit.Show measured momo.ai's Security frame at 25/100. No Content-Security-Policy and no HSTS. Served over HTTPS with a valid certificate.

How does Legit.Show measure momo.ai?

Legit.Show scores seven frames — Performance, Accessibility, Security, Privacy, Reliability, Standards and Discoverability — deterministically from the public surface (URL, HTTP headers, real Lighthouse), with no LLM in the scoring path. See legit.show/methodology.

Productivity

momo.ai

Last updated 2026-09-08 · benchmark measured 2026-09-08 — deterministic & reproducible

Email-native scheduling assistant that coordinates meetings from your inbox.

86/100

7/7 frames

Top 24% of 14,148 measured · #7 of 15 in meeting scheduler

Legit Benchmark — the simple average of 7 measured frames. Frames we could not measure are left out of the average, never counted as zero. Every frame is shown below with its evidence.

Checked 2026-09-08 · scores move as sites change

Are you the maker of momo.ai? Claim this listing. It is free, takes a meta tag, a DNS record or GitHub admin rights, and never changes the score.

Launched something? Add your product, free.

To cite this score: legit.show/s/momo-ai/2026-09-08. That address never changes; this page moves with every re-measure.

Legit.Show scored momo.ai 86/100 on 2026-09-08, measured across all 7 frames from its public surface. legit.show/s/momo-ai/2026-09-08

Is momo.ai production-ready?

Legit.Show scores momo.ai 86 out of 100 — the simple average of its 7 measured frames. Legit.Show ran its deterministic 7-Frame production-readiness benchmark on momo.ai (public-surface assessment), measured from the public surface with no LLM in the scoring path. Its strongest frame is Performance; its weakest is Security. Every frame it averages is published with its evidence on the Legit.Show listing.

The 7 Frames

Performance — 100/100
Accessibility — 91/100
Security — 25/100
How this compares across the catalogue: The Web Security Baseline
Privacy — 100/100
How this compares across the catalogue: The Privacy Gap
Reliability — 100/100
Standards — 89/100
Discoverability — 100/100

What we measured

No Content-Security-Policy and no HSTS.
Served over HTTPS with a valid certificate.
Real Lighthouse performance run — 1257 ms to first byte.
Returns a proper 404 for unknown routes.
3 of 3 sampled routes reachable.
Has a reachable privacy policy.
Sets cookies / loads scripts with no consent prompt.
Discoverable: structured data, sitemap, OpenGraph image, canonical URL.

Who it's for

Teams and professionals · Email-first users · Calendly alternatives · Remote workers · Enterprise scheduling

Pricing

Free: €0/month (5 scheduling requests, 1 calendar); Personal: €5/month or €50/year (unlimited requests, 2 calendars); Pro: €10/month or €100/year (unlimited requests, unlimited calendars, priority pro

Sources and updates

Description: Taken from momo.ai's own website on 2026-09-08.
Operator: momo.ai UG (haftungsbeschränkt), as named in momo.ai's terms, privacy page or footer.
Benchmark: Measured by Legit.Show from the live site, the way any visitor sees it — with no access to its code or accounts. Same method for every product, and no AI decides the score. Last checked 2026-09-08.

Put together from public information, without momo.ai's involvement. If anything here is wrong, tell us and a person will check it.

Visit momo.ai → · Alternatives to momo.ai → · How this was measured →