Legit.Show measured OphthaMCQ's Security frame at 80/100. Security headers present: HSTS, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, Referrer-Policy. Served over HTTPS with a valid certificate.

How does Legit.Show measure OphthaMCQ?

Legit.Show scores seven frames — Performance, Accessibility, Security, Privacy, Reliability, Standards and Discoverability — deterministically from the public surface (URL, HTTP headers, real Lighthouse), with no LLM in the scoring path. See legit.show/methodology.

Education & Reference

OphthaMCQ

Last updated 2026-09-09 · benchmark measured 2026-09-09 — deterministic & reproducible

MCQ practice platform for ophthalmology exam preparation in India.

78/100

7/7 frames

Top 51% of 14,199 measured · #27 of 44 in exam prep platform

Legit Benchmark — the simple average of 7 measured frames. Frames we could not measure are left out of the average, never counted as zero. Every frame is shown below with its evidence.

Checked 2026-09-09 · scores move as sites change

Are you the maker of OphthaMCQ? Claim this listing. It is free, takes a meta tag, a DNS record or GitHub admin rights, and never changes the score.

Launched something? Add your product, free.

To cite this score: legit.show/s/ophthamcq-org/2026-09-09. That address never changes; this page moves with every re-measure.

Legit.Show scored OphthaMCQ 78/100 on 2026-09-09, measured across all 7 frames from its public surface. legit.show/s/ophthamcq-org/2026-09-09

Is OphthaMCQ production-ready?

Legit.Show scores OphthaMCQ 78 out of 100 — the simple average of its 7 measured frames. Legit.Show ran its deterministic 7-Frame production-readiness benchmark on OphthaMCQ (public-surface assessment), measured from the public surface with no LLM in the scoring path. Its strongest frame is Reliability; its weakest is Privacy. Every frame it averages is published with its evidence on the Legit.Show listing.

The 7 Frames

Performance — 81/100
Accessibility — 96/100
Security — 80/100
How this compares across the catalogue: The Web Security Baseline
Privacy — 0/100
How this compares across the catalogue: The Privacy Gap
Reliability — 100/100
Standards — 92/100
Discoverability — 100/100

What we measured

Security headers present: HSTS, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, Referrer-Policy.
No Content-Security-Policy.
Served over HTTPS with a valid certificate.
Real Lighthouse performance run — 129 ms to first byte.
Returns a proper 404 for unknown routes.
3 of 3 sampled routes reachable.
No privacy policy found.
Sets cookies / loads scripts with no consent prompt.

Who it's for

Ophthalmology postgraduate residents · PG exam candidates · Medical students · Ophthalmologists

Pricing

₹249–₹549 per topic; institutional bulk licenses ₹500–1,000 per resident per year; free MCQs and glossary available

Sources and updates

Description: Taken from ophthamcq.org's own website on 2026-09-09.
Operator: OphthaMCQ, as named in ophthamcq.org's terms, privacy page or footer.
Benchmark: Measured by Legit.Show from the live site, the way any visitor sees it — with no access to its code or accounts. Same method for every product, and no AI decides the score. Last checked 2026-09-09.

Put together from public information, without OphthaMCQ's involvement. If anything here is wrong, tell us and a person will check it.

Visit OphthaMCQ → · Alternatives to OphthaMCQ → · How this was measured →