Is PulseChecker secure?

Legit.Show measured PulseChecker's Security frame at 100/100. Security headers present: CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, Referrer-Policy. Served over HTTPS with a valid certificate.

How does Legit.Show measure PulseChecker?

Legit.Show scores seven frames — Performance, Accessibility, Security, Privacy, Reliability, Standards and Discoverability — deterministically from the public surface (URL, HTTP headers, real Lighthouse), with no LLM in the scoring path. See legit.show/methodology.

Infrastructure & DevOps

PulseChecker

Last updated 2026-09-08 · benchmark measured 2026-09-08 — deterministic & reproducible

Uptime, cron, and AI agent monitoring for developers.

97/100

7/7 frames

Top 2% of 14,148 measured · #3 of 33 in uptime monitoring

Legit Benchmark — the simple average of 7 measured frames. Frames we could not measure are left out of the average, never counted as zero. Every frame is shown below with its evidence.

Checked 2026-09-08 · scores move as sites change

Are you the maker of PulseChecker? Claim this listing. It is free, takes a meta tag, a DNS record or GitHub admin rights, and never changes the score.

Launched something? Add your product, free.

To cite this score: legit.show/s/pulsechecker-dev/2026-09-08. That address never changes; this page moves with every re-measure.

Legit.Show scored PulseChecker 97/100 on 2026-09-08, measured across all 7 frames from its public surface. legit.show/s/pulsechecker-dev/2026-09-08

Is PulseChecker production-ready?

Legit.Show scores PulseChecker 97 out of 100 — the simple average of its 7 measured frames. Legit.Show ran its deterministic 7-Frame production-readiness benchmark on PulseChecker (public-surface assessment), measured from the public surface with no LLM in the scoring path. Its strongest frame is Accessibility; its weakest is Performance. Every frame it averages is published with its evidence on the Legit.Show listing.

The 7 Frames

Performance — 82/100
Accessibility — 100/100
Security — 100/100
How this compares across the catalogue: The Web Security Baseline
Privacy — 100/100
How this compares across the catalogue: The Privacy Gap
Reliability — 100/100
Standards — 94/100
Discoverability — 100/100

What we measured

Security headers present: CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, Referrer-Policy.
Served over HTTPS with a valid certificate.
Real Lighthouse performance run — 167 ms to first byte.
Returns a proper 404 for unknown routes.
3 of 3 sampled routes reachable.
Has a reachable privacy policy.
Sets cookies / loads scripts with no consent prompt.
Discoverable: structured data, sitemap, OpenGraph image, canonical URL.

Who it's for

Developers · DevOps engineers · AI/agent builders · Teams with cron jobs · SaaS operators

Pricing

Free: $0 (10 monitors, 5-minute checks, email alerts, 50 checks history); Pro: $7/month (unlimited monitors, 1-minute checks, webhook alerts, full history) — Pro billing not yet live

Sources and updates

Description: Taken from pulsechecker.dev's own website on 2026-09-08.
Operator: PulseChecker, as named in pulsechecker.dev's terms, privacy page or footer.
Benchmark: Measured by Legit.Show from the live site, the way any visitor sees it — with no access to its code or accounts. Same method for every product, and no AI decides the score. Last checked 2026-09-08.

Put together from public information, without PulseChecker's involvement. If anything here is wrong, tell us and a person will check it.

Visit PulseChecker → · Alternatives to PulseChecker → · How this was measured →