Legit.Show measured Qdrant's Security frame at 80/100. Security headers present: HSTS, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, Referrer-Policy. Served over HTTPS with a valid certificate.

How does Legit.Show measure Qdrant?

Legit.Show scores seven frames — Performance, Accessibility, Security, Privacy, Reliability, Standards and Discoverability — deterministically from the public surface (URL, HTTP headers, real Lighthouse), with no LLM in the scoring path. See legit.show/methodology.

Data & Analytics

Qdrant

Last updated 2026-08-03 · benchmark measured 2026-09-26 — deterministic & reproducible

Managed vector search service with free, standard, and enterprise pricing tiers.

67/100

7/7 frames

Top 80% of 14,148 measured · #24 of 27 in database engine

Legit Benchmark — the simple average of 7 measured frames. Frames we could not measure are left out of the average, never counted as zero. Every frame is shown below with its evidence.

Checked 2026-09-26 · scores move as sites change

Are you the maker of Qdrant? Claim this listing. It is free, takes a meta tag, a DNS record or GitHub admin rights, and never changes the score.

Launched something? Add your product, free.

To cite this score: legit.show/s/qdrant-tech/2026-09-26. That address never changes; this page moves with every re-measure.

Legit.Show scored Qdrant 67/100 on 2026-09-26, measured across all 7 frames from its public surface. legit.show/s/qdrant-tech/2026-09-26

Is Qdrant production-ready?

Legit.Show scores Qdrant 67 out of 100 — the simple average of its 7 measured frames. Legit.Show ran its deterministic 7-Frame production-readiness benchmark on Qdrant (public-surface assessment), measured from the public surface with no LLM in the scoring path. Its strongest frame is Reliability; its weakest is Privacy. Every frame it averages is published with its evidence on the Legit.Show listing.

The 7 Frames

Performance — 36/100
Accessibility — 88/100
Security — 80/100
How this compares across the catalogue: The Web Security Baseline
Privacy — 25/100
How this compares across the catalogue: The Privacy Gap
Reliability — 92/100
Standards — 67/100
Discoverability — 80/100

What we measured

Security headers present: HSTS, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, Referrer-Policy.
No Content-Security-Policy.
Served over HTTPS with a valid certificate.
Real Lighthouse performance run — 218 ms to first byte.
Returns a proper 404 for unknown routes.
0 of 0 sampled routes reachable.
No privacy policy found.
Sets cookies / loads scripts with no consent prompt.

Who built it

product account @qdrant_engine

Who it's for

AI engineers · Data scientists · Enterprise teams · E-commerce platforms · Healthcare organizations

Pricing

Free tier (1GB RAM/4GB disk); Standard tier usage-based; Premium tier minimum spend; Hybrid Cloud and Private Cloud custom pricing

Sources and updates

Description: Taken from qdrant.tech's own website on 2026-08-03.
Benchmark: Measured by Legit.Show from the live site, the way any visitor sees it — with no access to its code or accounts. Same method for every product, and no AI decides the score. Last checked 2026-09-26.

Put together from public information, without Qdrant's involvement. If anything here is wrong, tell us and a person will check it.

Visit Qdrant → · Alternatives to Qdrant → · How this was measured →