Productivity

Sourclip

Last updated 2026-07-14 · benchmark measured 2026-08-12 — deterministic & reproducible

Chrome extension that adds bulk import, organization, and export to Google NotebookLM.

Is Sourclip production-ready?

Legit.Show scores Sourclip 86 out of 100 — the simple average of its 7 measured frames. Legit.Show ran its deterministic 7-Frame production-readiness benchmark on Sourclip (public-surface assessment), measured from the public surface with no LLM in the scoring path. Its strongest frame is Reliability; its weakest is Performance. Every frame it averages is published with its evidence on the Legit.Show listing.

The 7 Frames

• Performance — 63/100
• Accessibility — 94/100
• Security — 80/100
• Privacy — 75/100
• Reliability — 100/100
• Standards — 92/100
• Discoverability — 100/100

What we measured

• Security headers present: HSTS, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, Referrer-Policy.
• No Content-Security-Policy.
• Served over HTTPS with a valid certificate.
• Real Lighthouse performance run — 723 ms to first byte.
• Returns a proper 404 for unknown routes.
• 3 of 3 sampled routes reachable.
• Has a reachable privacy policy.
• Sets cookies / loads scripts with no consent prompt.

Who it's for

NotebookLM users · Researchers · Content creators · Students · Knowledge workers

Pricing

Free ($0 with 10 captures/day limit); Pro ($24/year unlimited); Lifetime ($49 one-time)

Visit Sourclip → · Alternatives to Sourclip → · How this was measured →