Productivity

SubHawk

Last updated 2026-07-21 · benchmark checked 2026-08-09 · unchanged since 2026-07-21 — deterministic & reproducible

SubHawk tracks subscriptions and free trials with email renewal reminders.

Is SubHawk production-ready?

Legit.Show scores SubHawk 85 out of 100 — the simple average of its 7 measured frames. Legit.Show ran its deterministic 7-Frame production-readiness benchmark on SubHawk (public-surface assessment), measured from the public surface with no LLM in the scoring path. Its strongest frame is Performance; its weakest is Security. Every frame it averages is published with its evidence on the Legit.Show listing.

The 7 Frames

• Performance — 100/100
• Accessibility — 95/100
• Security — 45/100
• Privacy — 100/100
• Reliability — 100/100
• Standards — 92/100
• Discoverability — 60/100

What we measured

• Security headers present: HSTS.
• No Content-Security-Policy.
• Served over HTTPS with a valid certificate.
• Real Lighthouse performance run — 1770 ms to first byte.
• Returns a proper 404 for unknown routes.
• 3 of 3 sampled routes reachable.
• Has a reachable privacy policy.
• Sets cookies / loads scripts with no consent prompt.

Who it's for

Individuals · Subscription users · Budget-conscious consumers · People managing multiple services

Pricing

Free, no credit card required

Visit SubHawk → · Alternatives to SubHawk → · How this was measured →