Data & Analytics
Timetastic
Last updated 2026-06-19 · benchmark measured 2026-08-09 — deterministic & reproducible
Live data showing how often Google, Apple, and Microsoft calendar apps re-sync feeds.
Is Timetastic production-ready?
Legit.Show scores Timetastic 68 out of 100 — the simple average of its 4 measured frames. Legit.Show ran its deterministic 7-Frame production-readiness benchmark on Timetastic (public-surface assessment), measured from the public surface with no LLM in the scoring path. Its strongest frame is Accessibility; its weakest is Privacy. 4 of the seven frames returned a score; Security, Reliability and Discoverability were not measurable on this service and are recorded as null — not as zero. Every frame it averages is published with its evidence on the Legit.Show listing.
The 7 Frames
- Performance — 84/100
- Accessibility — 95/100
- Security — not measurable on this service (null — not scored as 0)
- Privacy — 25/100
- Reliability — not measurable on this service (null — not scored as 0)
- Standards — 67/100
- Discoverability — not measurable on this service (null — not scored as 0)
What we measured
- No Content-Security-Policy and no HSTS.
- Served over HTTPS with a valid certificate.
- Real Lighthouse performance run — 0 ms to first byte.
- Returns a proper 404 for unknown routes.
- 0 of 0 sampled routes reachable.
- No privacy policy found.
- Sets cookies / loads scripts with no consent prompt.
- Discoverable: sitemap.
Who built it
product account @Timetastic
Who it's for
Teams using calendar feeds · Calendar app users · Time-off management users · Enterprise teams · HR departments
Visit Timetastic → · Alternatives to Timetastic → · How this was measured →