Productivity

Tamamon

Last updated 2026-07-05 · benchmark measured 2026-08-13 — deterministic & reproducible

A macOS desktop pet that hatches and grows as you code with Claude Code.

Is Tamamon production-ready?

Legit.Show scores Tamamon 72 out of 100 — the simple average of its 7 measured frames. Legit.Show ran its deterministic 7-Frame production-readiness benchmark on Tamamon (public-surface assessment), measured from the public surface with no LLM in the scoring path. Its strongest frame is Reliability; its weakest is Privacy. Every frame it averages is published with its evidence on the Legit.Show listing.

The 7 Frames

• Performance — 77/100
• Accessibility — 96/100
• Security — 45/100
• Privacy — 0/100
• Reliability — 100/100
• Standards — 89/100
• Discoverability — 100/100

What we measured

• Security headers present: HSTS.
• No Content-Security-Policy.
• Served over HTTPS with a valid certificate.
• Real Lighthouse performance run — 326 ms to first byte.
• Returns a proper 404 for unknown routes.
• 3 of 3 sampled routes reachable.
• No privacy policy found.
• Sets cookies / loads scripts with no consent prompt.

Who built it

Jason Jeong

Who it's for

Mac developers · Claude Code users · Virtual pet enthusiasts · Productivity-minded coders

Pricing

Free (optional tips available on Ko-fi)

Visit Tamamon → · Alternatives to Tamamon → · How this was measured →