Legit.Show measured Telegram's Security frame at 60/100. Security headers present: HSTS, X-Frame-Options. Served over HTTPS with a valid certificate.

How does Legit.Show measure Telegram?

Legit.Show scores seven frames — Performance, Accessibility, Security, Privacy, Reliability, Standards and Discoverability — deterministically from the public surface (URL, HTTP headers, real Lighthouse), with no LLM in the scoring path. See legit.show/methodology.

Telegram review — is it legit & production-ready?

Productivity

Last updated 2026-08-03 · benchmark measured 2026-09-21 — deterministic & reproducible

Telegram is a cloud-based mobile and desktop messaging app focused on security and speed.

72/100

7/7 frames

Top 68% of 14,148 measured · #6 of 11 in encrypted messaging app

Legit Benchmark — the simple average of 7 measured frames. Frames we could not measure are left out of the average, never counted as zero. Every frame is shown below with its evidence.

Checked 2026-09-21 · scores move as sites change

Are you the maker of Telegram? Claim this listing. It is free, takes a meta tag, a DNS record or GitHub admin rights, and never changes the score.

Launched something? Add your product, free.

To cite this score: legit.show/s/telegram-org/2026-09-21. That address never changes; this page moves with every re-measure.

Legit.Show scored Telegram 72/100 on 2026-09-21, measured across all 7 frames from its public surface. legit.show/s/telegram-org/2026-09-21

Is Telegram production-ready?

Legit.Show scores Telegram 72 out of 100 — the simple average of its 7 measured frames. Legit.Show ran its deterministic 7-Frame production-readiness benchmark on Telegram (public-surface assessment), measured from the public surface with no LLM in the scoring path. Its strongest frame is Standards; its weakest is Discoverability. Every frame it averages is published with its evidence on the Legit.Show listing.

The 7 Frames

Performance — 90/100
Accessibility — 75/100
Security — 60/100
How this compares across the catalogue: The Web Security Baseline
Privacy — 70/100
How this compares across the catalogue: The Privacy Gap
Reliability — 75/100
Standards — 92/100
Discoverability — 40/100

What we measured

Security headers present: HSTS, X-Frame-Options.
No Content-Security-Policy.
Served over HTTPS with a valid certificate.
Real Lighthouse performance run — 682 ms to first byte.
3 of 3 sampled routes reachable.
Has a reachable privacy policy.
Sets cookies / loads scripts with no consent prompt.
Discoverable: OpenGraph image.

Who built it

Pavel Durov · product account @telegram

Who it's for

individuals · businesses · groups · communities · developers

Sources and updates

Description: Taken from telegram.org's own website on 2026-08-03.
Operator: Telegram Messenger Inc., as named in telegram.org's terms, privacy page or footer.
Benchmark: Measured by Legit.Show from the live site, the way any visitor sees it — with no access to its code or accounts. Same method for every product, and no AI decides the score. Last checked 2026-09-21.

Put together from public information, without Telegram's involvement. If anything here is wrong, tell us and a person will check it.

Visit Telegram → · Alternatives to Telegram → · How this was measured →

Telegram