Developer Tools

testmagic.link

Last updated 2026-08-20 · benchmark checked 2026-09-24 · unchanged since 2026-08-20 — deterministic & reproducible

Disposable email addresses for testing magic-link sign-in flows.

Are you the maker of testmagic.link? Claim this listing. It is free, takes a meta tag, a DNS record or GitHub admin rights, and never changes the score.

Launched something? Add your product, free.

To cite this score: legit.show/s/testmagic-link/2026-09-24. That address never changes; this page moves with every re-measure.

Legit.Show scored testmagic.link 69/100 on 2026-09-24, measured across all 7 frames from its public surface. legit.show/s/testmagic-link/2026-09-24

Is testmagic.link production-ready?

Legit.Show scores testmagic.link 69 out of 100 — the simple average of its 7 measured frames. Legit.Show ran its deterministic 7-Frame production-readiness benchmark on testmagic.link (public-surface assessment), measured from the public surface with no LLM in the scoring path. Its strongest frame is Performance; its weakest is Privacy. Every frame it averages is published with its evidence on the Legit.Show listing.

The 7 Frames

• Performance — 100/100
• Accessibility — 93/100
• Security — 80/100
  How this compares across the catalogue: The Web Security Baseline
• Privacy — 25/100
  How this compares across the catalogue: The Privacy Gap
• Reliability — 70/100
• Standards — 79/100
• Discoverability — 35/100

What we measured

• Security headers present: CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, Referrer-Policy.
• No HSTS.
• Served over HTTPS with a valid certificate.
• Real Lighthouse performance run — 559 ms to first byte.
• Returns a proper 404 for unknown routes.
• 0 of 1 sampled routes reachable.
• No privacy policy found.
• Sets cookies / loads scripts with no consent prompt.

Who it's for

AI agents · developers · QA testers

Sources and updates

Description

Taken from testmagic.link's own website on 2026-08-20.

Benchmark

Measured by Legit.Show from the live site, the way any visitor sees it — with no access to its code or accounts. Same method for every product, and no AI decides the score. Last checked 2026-09-24.

Put together from public information, without testmagic.link's involvement. If anything here is wrong, tell us and a person will check it.

Visit testmagic.link → · Alternatives to testmagic.link → · How this was measured →