Is Tiger Data secure?

Legit.Show measured Tiger Data's Security frame at 80/100. Security headers present: CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options. Served over HTTPS with a valid certificate.

How does Legit.Show measure Tiger Data?

Legit.Show scores seven frames — Performance, Accessibility, Security, Privacy, Reliability, Standards and Discoverability — deterministically from the public surface (URL, HTTP headers, real Lighthouse), with no LLM in the scoring path. See legit.show/methodology.

Data & Analytics

Tiger Data

Last updated 2026-08-20 · benchmark measured 2026-08-20 — deterministic & reproducible

Managed PostgreSQL database service with tiered pricing for time-series and analytics workloads.

83/100

7/7 frames

Top 34% of 14,148 measured · #8 of 27 in database engine

Legit Benchmark — the simple average of 7 measured frames. Frames we could not measure are left out of the average, never counted as zero. Every frame is shown below with its evidence.

Checked 2026-08-20 · scores move as sites change

Are you the maker of Tiger Data? Claim this listing. It is free, takes a meta tag, a DNS record or GitHub admin rights, and never changes the score.

Launched something? Add your product, free.

To cite this score: legit.show/s/timescale-com/2026-08-20. That address never changes; this page moves with every re-measure.

Legit.Show scored Tiger Data 83/100 on 2026-08-20, measured across all 7 frames from its public surface. legit.show/s/timescale-com/2026-08-20

Is Tiger Data production-ready?

Legit.Show scores Tiger Data 83 out of 100 — the simple average of its 7 measured frames. Legit.Show ran its deterministic 7-Frame production-readiness benchmark on Tiger Data (public-surface assessment), measured from the public surface with no LLM in the scoring path. Its strongest frame is Privacy; its weakest is Performance. Every frame it averages is published with its evidence on the Legit.Show listing.

The 7 Frames

Performance — 34/100
Accessibility — 92/100
Security — 80/100
How this compares across the catalogue: The Web Security Baseline
Privacy — 100/100
How this compares across the catalogue: The Privacy Gap
Reliability — 100/100
Standards — 76/100
Discoverability — 100/100

What we measured

Security headers present: CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options.
Served over HTTPS with a valid certificate.
Real Lighthouse performance run — 292 ms to first byte.
Returns a proper 404 for unknown routes.
3 of 3 sampled routes reachable.
Has a reachable privacy policy.
Sets cookies / loads scripts with no consent prompt.
Discoverable: structured data, sitemap, OpenGraph image, canonical URL.

Who built it

Ajay Kulkarni · product account @TigerDatabase

Who it's for

startups · enterprises · machine data workloads · sensor data applications · real-time analytics

Pricing

Performance: Compute $30/month + Storage $0.177/GB-month; Scale: Compute $36/month + Storage $0.212/GB-month; Enterprise: Custom pricing. 30-day free trial available.

Sources and updates

Description: Taken from timescale.com's own website on 2026-08-20.
Operator: Timescale, Inc., as named in timescale.com's terms, privacy page or footer.
Benchmark: Measured by Legit.Show from the live site, the way any visitor sees it — with no access to its code or accounts. Same method for every product, and no AI decides the score. Last checked 2026-08-20.

Put together from public information, without Tiger Data's involvement. If anything here is wrong, tell us and a person will check it.

Visit Tiger Data → · Alternatives to Tiger Data → · How this was measured →