Productivity
toepoke
Last updated 2026-06-30 · benchmark checked 2026-08-09 · unchanged since 2026-08-08 — deterministic & reproducible
A free tool for organising weekly 5-a-side and amateur football games.
Is toepoke production-ready?
Legit.Show scores toepoke 62 out of 100 — the simple average of its 7 measured frames. Legit.Show ran its deterministic 7-Frame production-readiness benchmark on toepoke (public-surface assessment), measured from the public surface with no LLM in the scoring path. Its strongest frame is Accessibility; its weakest is Privacy. Every frame it averages is published with its evidence on the Legit.Show listing.
The 7 Frames
- Performance — 65/100
- Accessibility — 91/100
- Security — 55/100
- Privacy — 0/100
- Reliability — 75/100
- Standards — 75/100
- Discoverability — 70/100
What we measured
- Security headers present: HSTS, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options.
- No Content-Security-Policy.
- Served over HTTPS with a valid certificate.
- Real Lighthouse performance run — 760 ms to first byte.
- 3 of 3 sampled routes reachable.
- No privacy policy found.
- Sets cookies / loads scripts with no consent prompt.
- Discoverable: sitemap, OpenGraph image.
Who built it
fj (@franzjunge) · product account @toepoke_co_uk
Who it's for
Football players · Match organizers · Sports enthusiasts · Casual football clubs
Pricing
Free
Visit toepoke → · Alternatives to toepoke → · How this was measured →