Legit.Show measured Gard's Security frame at 100/100. Security headers present: CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, Referrer-Policy. Served over HTTPS with a valid certificate.

How does Legit.Show measure Gard?

Legit.Show scores seven frames — Performance, Accessibility, Security, Privacy, Reliability, Standards and Discoverability — deterministically from the public surface (URL, HTTP headers, real Lighthouse), with no LLM in the scoring path. See legit.show/methodology.

Design & Creative

Gard

Last updated 2026-07-28 · benchmark checked 2026-09-23 · unchanged since 2026-08-19 — deterministic & reproducible

Gard scans images, ads, and packaging designs for text errors and typos.

78/100

7/7 frames

Top 51% of 14,138 measured

Legit Benchmark — the simple average of 7 measured frames. Frames we could not measure are left out of the average, never counted as zero. Every frame is shown below with its evidence.

Checked 2026-09-23 · scores move as sites change

Are you the maker of Gard? Claim this listing. It is free, takes a meta tag, a DNS record or GitHub admin rights, and never changes the score.

Launched something? Add your product, free.

To cite this score: legit.show/s/trygard-com/2026-09-23. That address never changes; this page moves with every re-measure.

Legit.Show scored Gard 78/100 on 2026-09-23, measured across all 7 frames from its public surface. legit.show/s/trygard-com/2026-09-23

Is Gard production-ready?

Legit.Show scores Gard 78 out of 100 — the simple average of its 7 measured frames. Legit.Show ran its deterministic 7-Frame production-readiness benchmark on Gard (public-surface assessment), measured from the public surface with no LLM in the scoring path. Its strongest frame is Security; its weakest is Discoverability. Every frame it averages is published with its evidence on the Legit.Show listing.

The 7 Frames

Performance — 74/100
Accessibility — 99/100
Security — 100/100
How this compares across the catalogue: The Web Security Baseline
Privacy — 75/100
How this compares across the catalogue: The Privacy Gap
Reliability — 92/100
Standards — 64/100
Discoverability — 40/100

What we measured

Security headers present: CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, Referrer-Policy.
Served over HTTPS with a valid certificate.
Real Lighthouse performance run — 127 ms to first byte.
Returns a proper 404 for unknown routes.
0 of 0 sampled routes reachable.
Has a reachable privacy policy.
Sets cookies / loads scripts with no consent prompt.
Discoverable: structured data, sitemap.

Who built it

product account @gard_app

Who it's for

Ad & Social Agencies · Brand & Marketing Teams · Email Marketers · E-commerce Sellers · Packaging Designers

Pricing

Free plan (5 scans/month); Starter $24/mo billed annually ($288/yr); Pro $74/mo billed annually ($888/yr); Enterprise available

Sources and updates

Description: Taken from trygard.com's own website on 2026-07-28.
Operator: Gard Media LLC, as named in trygard.com's terms, privacy page or footer.
Benchmark: Measured by Legit.Show from the live site, the way any visitor sees it — with no access to its code or accounts. Same method for every product, and no AI decides the score. Last checked 2026-09-23.

Put together from public information, without Gard's involvement. If anything here is wrong, tell us and a person will check it.

Visit Gard → · Alternatives to Gard → · How this was measured →