Education & Reference

TypeCram

Last updated 2026-07-17 · benchmark measured 2026-08-09 — deterministic & reproducible

Typing practice platform using real stories, races, and a structured course.

Is TypeCram production-ready?

Legit.Show scores TypeCram 75 out of 100 — the simple average of its 7 measured frames. Legit.Show ran its deterministic 7-Frame production-readiness benchmark on TypeCram (public-surface assessment), measured from the public surface with no LLM in the scoring path. Its strongest frame is Privacy; its weakest is Discoverability. Every frame it averages is published with its evidence on the Legit.Show listing.

The 7 Frames

• Performance — 77/100
• Accessibility — 96/100
• Security — 45/100
• Privacy — 100/100
• Reliability — 67/100
• Standards — 92/100
• Discoverability — 45/100

What we measured

• Security headers present: HSTS.
• No Content-Security-Policy.
• Served over HTTPS with a valid certificate.
• Real Lighthouse performance run — 304 ms to first byte.
• 0 of 0 sampled routes reachable.
• Has a reachable privacy policy.
• Sets cookies / loads scripts with no consent prompt.
• Discoverable: sitemap.

Who it's for

Students · Typing learners · Content creators · Book enthusiasts · Competitive typists

Pricing

Free (limited): 3 stories/day, 3 book levels/day, rooms up to 10 players, first chapter of course, 150 pages to import. Plus: $5/month ($36/year). Premium pages: $10 (1,500 pages), $24 (4,500 pages),

Visit TypeCram → · Alternatives to TypeCram → · How this was measured →