Developer Tools
AI Usage Tracker
Last updated 2026-07-21 · benchmark measured 2026-08-09 — deterministic & reproducible
Local dashboard that tracks AI coding tool costs across Claude and Codex.
Is AI Usage Tracker production-ready?
Legit.Show scores AI Usage Tracker 60 out of 100 — the simple average of its 6 measured frames. Legit.Show ran its deterministic 7-Frame production-readiness benchmark on AI Usage Tracker (public-surface assessment), measured from the public surface with no LLM in the scoring path. Its strongest frame is Performance; its weakest is Privacy. 6 of the seven frames returned a score; Accessibility was not measurable on this service and is recorded as null — not as zero. Every frame it averages is published with its evidence on the Legit.Show listing.
The 7 Frames
- Performance — 80/100
- Accessibility — not measurable on this service (null — not scored as 0)
- Security — 45/100
- Privacy — 25/100
- Reliability — 67/100
- Standards — 75/100
- Discoverability — 70/100
What we measured
- Security headers present: X-Content-Type-Options, Referrer-Policy.
- No Content-Security-Policy and no HSTS.
- Served over HTTPS with a valid certificate.
- Real Lighthouse performance run — 153 ms to first byte.
- 0 of 0 sampled routes reachable.
- No privacy policy found.
- Sets cookies / loads scripts with no consent prompt.
- Discoverable: sitemap, OpenGraph image.
Who it's for
Developers · AI tool users · Teams managing AI costs · Claude Code users · Budget-conscious engineers
Pricing
$9 one-time lifetime premium; free MIT source available
Visit AI Usage Tracker → · Alternatives to AI Usage Tracker → · How this was measured →